Police brutality leads connect attorneys with individuals who have experienced excessive force, unlawful detention, or civil rights violations by law enforcement. These leads often involve complex legal issues and high emotional stakes, requiring experienced legal handling.
Most police brutality cases involve claims filed under Section 1983 for civil rights violations. These leads can lead to substantial settlements when supported by strong evidence such as body cam footage, witness testimony, or medical reports.
Police brutality leads occur less frequently than general personal injury leads but tend to spike after high-profile incidents or periods of civil unrest.
In 2024, over 1,300 deaths were linked to police actions in the U.S., reflecting a persistent demand for legal support in civil rights cases. Attorneys in this space should monitor news cycles and social media trends to anticipate lead surges.
Effective intake starts with documenting the incident details, including date, location, involved officers, and nature of the force used. Medical reports and any video evidence should be prioritized early in the intake process.
Attorneys should ask about criminal charges filed, witness names, prior complaints against officers, and whether a complaint was submitted to internal affairs. These details help validate the claim and assess its legal strength.
The information provided on this site is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or will be formed by use of the site. Counsel Stack is not a law firm or your lawyer. Our software is designed for attorneys and legal professionals. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. Nothing can substitute a real attorney when it comes to providing legitimate legal representation. If you need an attorney, find one, or email ai@counselstack.com, and we will connect you with our network of licensed attorneys in the relevant jurisdiction.
Similarly, Counsel Stack recommends that all attorneys using our platform follow the rules of professional conduct, standing orders, and other laws or regulations that govern the profession in their respective jurisdiction and practice area. Some jurisdictions require disclosure of AI use, others don’t. As a software company, we aren’t in a position to prescribe legal advice or a specific course of action.
Any actions taken by a nonlawyer user of Counsel Stack services must understand it is a software company, not a law firm, and therefore does not carry with it the protections normally afforded as part of the client-lawyer relationship. The recipient of any law-related services should not expect, for example, that the protection of client confidences, prohibitions against representation of persons with conflicting interests, and obligations of a lawyer to maintain professional independence apply to the provision of law-related services when that may not be the case.
Counsel Stack is not a lawyer referral service.
Copyright © 2025 Counsel Stack, Inc. All Rights Reserved.